|
|
(48 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Policy ____ [''Number from Table of Contents''] | + | Policy 205 |
| == Introduction == | | == Introduction == |
− | Appalachian State University’s Academic Integrity Code is designed to create an atmosphere of trust, respect, fairness, honesty, and responsibility. The Academic Integrity Code outlines “user-friendly” procedures and mechanisms for resolving alleged violations of academic
| |
− | integrity. The Academic Integrity Code is the result of cooperation among Appalachian’s faculty, students, and administrators, and promotes a campus dialogue about academic integrity. All members of the Appalachian State University community are responsible for promoting an ethical learning environment.
| |
| | | |
| == Scope == | | == Scope == |
− |
| |
| | | |
| == Definitions == | | == Definitions == |
− |
| |
− | === Definition phrase or word ===
| |
− | : Definition summary
| |
− |
| |
| | | |
| == Policy and Procedure Statements == | | == Policy and Procedure Statements == |
| === The Academic Integrity Code === | | === The Academic Integrity Code === |
− | Students attending Appalachian State University agree to abide by the following Code:
| + | :[https://academicintegrity.appstate.edu/ Academic Integrity] |
− | #Students will not lie, cheat, or steal to gain academic advantage.
| + | |
− | #Students will oppose every instance of academic dishonesty.
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | Students shall agree to abide by the Academic Integrity Code when submitting the admission
| + | |
− | application.
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | === The Honor Pledge ===
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | The Honor Pledge is a cornerstone of the Appalachian State University’s Academic Integrity
| + | |
− | Code and serves as a reminder of the University’s commitment to academic integrity. No
| + | |
− | Appalachian student shall unfairly further their own academic performance.
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | Students attending Appalachian State University pledge:
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | '''''I pledge on my honor that I have not violated the Appalachian State University Academic
| + | |
− | Integrity Code.'''''
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | IV. Academic Integrity Code Violations
| + | |
− | Violations of the Academic Integrity Code will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Faculty
| + | |
− | should address incidents as possible Academic Integrity Code violations only when, in their
| + | |
− | professional judgment, such violations were intentional on the part of the student. The following
| + | |
− | is a list of violations of the Academic Integrity Code. This list is not exhaustive;
| + | |
− | however, its terms are broad enough to encompass most potential Code violations.
| + | |
− | • Lying. False academic information in any form, regardless of communication
| + | |
− | method (e.g. including email or other electronic communication).
| + | |
− | • Cheating. The use of fraud or deceit to gain an advantage in academic endeavors,
| + | |
− | regardless of delivery methods (e.g. face-to-face, online, or via distance
| + | |
− | education). Examples of cheating include but are not limited to fraud, deception,
| + | |
− | impermissible communication of information, copying, falsifying data,
| + | |
− | unauthorized use or possession of study aids, memoranda, books, data, or other
| + | |
− | information, for the purpose of unfairly manipulating academic materials.
| + | |
− | • Plagiarism. Presenting the words or ideas of another as one’s own work or ideas.
| + | |
− | All directly quoted material must be properly cited. Plagiarism includes but is
| + | |
− | not limited to borrowing, downloading, cutting and pasting, and paraphrasing
| + | |
− | without acknowledgement, including from online sources, or allowing a person’s
| + | |
− | academic work to be submitted as another’s work.
| + | |
− | 45
| + | |
− | • Unauthorized Assistance. Giving or receiving assistance not specifi cally permitted
| + | |
− | by an instructor. (Examples: see under cheating)
| + | |
− | • Stealing of Academic Materials. The act of taking academic materials, without
| + | |
− | an instructor’s or student’s consent, for the purpose of gaining an advantage
| + | |
− | over other students. This includes but is not limited to stealing or attempted
| + | |
− | stealing of notes, papers, books, library materials, tests, answer keys, computer
| + | |
− | programs, or any electronic devices.
| + | |
− | • Multiple Submission without an Instructor’s Consent. Submitting the same
| + | |
− | work more than once without permission from all faculty involved.
| + | |
− | • Assisting Code Violations. Helping another student violate the Code. Examples
| + | |
− | of assisting code violations include but are not limited to allowing another student
| + | |
− | to copy work, provide answers to questions appearing on assignments, quizzes,
| + | |
− | or exams, unauthorized collaboration, and taking an exam for another student.
| + | |
− | V. Roles of the University Community
| + | |
− | A. Faculty
| + | |
− | Faculty members are responsible for educating students about academic integrity by
| + | |
− | placing a statement about the Academic Integrity Code on class syllabi. Further, faculty
| + | |
− | members are encouraged to limit opportunities for dishonest behavior. Several strategies
| + | |
− | for reducing Academic Integrity Code violations are listed below. Faculty members may:
| + | |
− | • Lead discussions about academic integrity during class.
| + | |
− | • Create multiple versions of quizzes and exams.
| + | |
− | • Proctor quizzes and exams.
| + | |
− | • Provide a space for students to reaffi rm the Academic Integrity Honor Pledge
| + | |
− | (abbreviation: HP) on assignments, quizzes, and exams.
| + | |
− | • Contact the Offi ce of Student Conduct in all appropriate cases of academic
| + | |
− | dishonesty.
| + | |
− | • Include a statement about the Code of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity
| + | |
− | Code (with Offi ce of Student Conduct website address) on syllabi.
| + | |
− | • Use current events to illustrate and discuss integrity issues.
| + | |
− | B. Students
| + | |
− | Students are responsible for completing their own work on assignments, quizzes, and
| + | |
− | tests and for discouraging their peers from violating the Academic Integrity Code. When
| + | |
− | instructed to do so by a faculty member, students are required to include the Academic
| + | |
− | Integrity Honor Pledge (or an abbreviated form of it) on assignments, quizzes, and exams.
| + | |
− | Further, students may:
| + | |
− | • Report all incidents of academic dishonesty to the Offi ce of Student Conduct.
| + | |
− | • Inform the appropriate persons when witnessing academic dishonesty.
| + | |
− | • Participate in discussions about academic integrity.
| + | |
− | • Challenge their peers to uphold academic honesty.
| + | |
− | C. Administration
| + | |
− | Appalachian State University’s administration provides support for the Academic Integrity
| + | |
− | Code through the activities described in Section VI.
| + | |
− | 46
| + | |
− | VI. Administration of the Code
| + | |
− | A. Violations
| + | |
− | Alleged Academic Integrity Code violations must be reported to the Offi ce of Student
| + | |
− | Conduct if the faculty member proposes that a sanction, as defi ned in Section VIII, be
| + | |
− | imposed on the student. The Director of Student Conduct or his or her designee will
| + | |
− | explain all available options to the faculty member and student involved in the alleged
| + | |
− | violation. Cases in which the faculty member proposes to take no action beyond requiring
| + | |
− | the student to repeat the assignment may be resolved informally between the faculty
| + | |
− | member and the student without being brought before the Offi ce of Student Conduct or
| + | |
− | the Academic Integrity Board (AIB). In such cases, however, the faculty member must
| + | |
− | utilize the form entitled “Proposed Requirement That You Repeat Assignment; Notifi cation
| + | |
− | of Due Process Rights.” This requires the student to affi rm in writing that he/she is
| + | |
− | aware of his/her option to refer the issue to Student Conduct but chooses the opportunity
| + | |
− | to repeat the assignment instead. The faculty member should provide one copy of this
| + | |
− | written statement to the student and retain the original in the faculty member’s fi les.
| + | |
− | A student that has an alleged violation of the Academic Integrity Code is prohibited from
| + | |
− | withdrawing from the course. Should a student withdraw from the class prior to the accusation
| + | |
− | and/or resolution, the mark of "w" will be considered temporary pending the
| + | |
− | fi nal resolution of the case. If a student is found responsible for an Academic Integrity
| + | |
− | violation and receives a lower or failing grade in a course for violating the Academic
| + | |
− | Integrity Code that course cannot be retroactively dropped.
| + | |
− | 1. Resolution by Consent Without Resort to Academic Integrity Code Formal
| + | |
− | Processes
| + | |
− | Academic Integrity Code violations may be resolved by consent between
| + | |
− | the student and the faculty member without resort to the formal processes
| + | |
− | of the Academic Integrity Code, pursuant to this Section VI.A.1., or such
| + | |
− | violations must be reported to the Offi ce of Student Conduct as provided
| + | |
− | in Section VI.A.2, below. If the faculty member proposes to resolve the
| + | |
− | violation by consent by imposing one of the sanctions specifi ed in Section
| + | |
− | VIII.A., the faculty member must do so utilizing the form entitled
| + | |
− | “Notifi cation of Proposed Imposition of Sanction for Academic Integrity
| + | |
− | Violation; Notifi cation of Due Process Rights (Notifi cation).” A faculty
| + | |
− | member may not impose sanctions to resolve a violation by consent pursuant
| + | |
− | to this Section VI.A.1 without utilizing the Notifi cation form. If the
| + | |
− | student decides to resolve the violation pursuant to this Section VI.A.1,
| + | |
− | the student must sign the form, and the faculty member must make a
| + | |
− | copy of the form for the student and retain the original for at least fi ve
| + | |
− | years. A copy is also to be transmitted to the Offi ce of Student Conduct
| + | |
− | and kept on fi le there for at least fi ve years.
| + | |
− | 2. Reporting Violations
| + | |
− | Academic Integrity Code violations not resolved by consent pursuant to
| + | |
− | this Section VI.A.1., must be reported to the Offi ce of Student Conduct if
| + | |
− | the faculty member proposes that one or more sanctions (as described in
| + | |
− | Section VIII) be imposed. The Director of Student Conduct will explain
| + | |
− | all available options to the faculty member and student involved in the
| + | |
− | alleged violation.
| + | |
− | 47
| + | |
− | B. Review Offi cer
| + | |
− | The Director of Student Conduct serves as the review offi cer or, as may be necessary,
| + | |
− | appoints a member of the AIB to act in this capacity. An AIB member serving as a review
| + | |
− | offi cer in a given case may not vote in a hearing on it. The responsibilities of the
| + | |
− | review offi cer include:
| + | |
− | • Investigating all reported incidents of academic dishonesty.
| + | |
− | • Advising the parties involved in hearings.
| + | |
− | • Handling all outside correspondence.
| + | |
− | • Conducting and reporting on all faculty/student resolution processes.
| + | |
− | • Preparing written statements for the hearing process.
| + | |
− | • Forwarding all appeals to the Provost or his or her designee for a decision.
| + | |
− | C. Faculty/Student Resolution Process
| + | |
− | All fi rst time offenses may be handled in the faculty/student resolution process. Written
| + | |
− | notice of the resolution process must be mailed to the faculty member and the student
| + | |
− | involved at least seven (7) business days in advance of a resolution process meeting.
| + | |
− | The review offi cer facilitates and records the meeting’s outcome. The faculty member
| + | |
− | and the accused student must agree upon one of the sanctions to decide the case in this
| + | |
− | phase or determine that there was not an intentional violation of the Academic Integrity
| + | |
− | Code. If agreement is reached, the faculty member, student, and hearing offi cer sign a
| + | |
− | standard form stating the terms of the resolution. A copy of the resolution form is retained
| + | |
− | in the Offi ce of Student Conduct until the student leaves the University. If the faculty
| + | |
− | member and student do not agree upon a resolution, the case is referred to the AIB for a
| + | |
− | hearing. All decisions agreed to in the resolution phase are fi nal and cannot be appealed.
| + | |
− | Either the faculty member or student may waive their right to the resolution process. If a
| + | |
− | faculty member or student does not wish to participate in the resolution process, the case
| + | |
− | is referred to the AIB for a hearing. Faculty members may re-enter the process during
| + | |
− | the hearing as a complainant or witness.
| + | |
− | D. Hearings
| + | |
− | Proceedings under the Academic Integrity Code shall be consistent with the provisions
| + | |
− | of the AIB by-laws. First offenses may be resolved between the student and the faculty
| + | |
− | member; a record is then maintained in the Offi ce of Student Conduct. All second offenses
| + | |
− | are decided through an AIB hearing. The Chairperson of the AIB presides over
| + | |
− | the hearing. Seven AIB members constitute a quorum. The AIB’s fi nal decision is made
| + | |
− | by a majority vote. The rules governing AIB hearings include:
| + | |
− | • Notifi cation of the hearing date and the specifi c charges of academic dishonesty,
| + | |
− | including an outline of the information to be introduced, are mailed to the accused
| + | |
− | student at least fi ve (5) academic days, including fi nal examination days,
| + | |
− | in advance.
| + | |
− | • The burden of proof is on the faculty member and/or student bringing forth
| + | |
− | the charges. The Offi ce of Student Conduct provides administrative support
| + | |
− | for faculty and students bringing forth charges of academic dishonesty. The
| + | |
− | Offi ce of Student Conduct also provides information about the process for the
| + | |
− | accused student.
| + | |
− | • Formal rules of evidence are not applicable. The AIB Chairperson must give
| + | |
− | attention to the rules of confi dentiality and privilege.
| + | |
− | • Students and faculty are allowed one (1) advisor. Advisors may speak to the
| + | |
− | student or faculty member, but may not speak for the student or faculty member.
| + | |
− | 48
| + | |
− | • The accused student and the Academic Integrity Board are permitted to question
| + | |
− | the complainant and all witnesses.
| + | |
− | • AIB hearings and deliberations are closed to the public.
| + | |
− | • All hearings are recorded and may be transcribed when necessary. Recordings
| + | |
− | of hearings remain the exclusive property of the University. Students must
| + | |
− | review recordings in the presence of Student Conduct personnel.
| + | |
− | • Witnesses are excluded from the hearing during the testimony of other witnesses.
| + | |
− | All witnesses are excluded from AIB deliberations.
| + | |
− | • The AIB fi nds in-violation or not in-violation of the Academic Integrity Code
| + | |
− | on the basis of the preponderance of evidence.
| + | |
− | • If the AIB fi nds the student in-violation, the Offi ce of Student Conduct retains
| + | |
− | a record of the fi nding and sanction for a minimum of fi ve (5) years.
| + | |
− | VII. Academic Integrity Board (AIB)
| + | |
− | A. Composition
| + | |
− | Appalachian State University’s Academic Integrity Board consists of twelve (12) members.
| + | |
− | Six (6) faculty members and six (6) students are appointed to the Board. Faculty AIB
| + | |
− | members are nominated by the Committee on Committees of the Faculty Senate from a
| + | |
− | list of volunteers willing to serve, and approved by a vote of the Faculty Senate. Faculty
| + | |
− | members serve three-year staggered terms and may be nominated for consecutive terms.
| + | |
− | Student AIB members are selected by the Conduct Personnel Committee (see Section 3.06
| + | |
− | of the Code of Student Conduct). Student AIB members serve two-year staggered terms.
| + | |
− | B. Committees
| + | |
− | The AIB contains two (2) standing committees: (1) the faculty committee and (2) the
| + | |
− | student committee.
| + | |
− | 1. Faculty Committee
| + | |
− | The Faculty Committee is composed of the AIB’s six (6) faculty members and
| + | |
− | one (1) student member. This committee is charged with:
| + | |
− | • Providing their peers with guidelines for promoting and enforcing academic
| + | |
− | integrity.
| + | |
− | • Educating faculty about academic integrity issues.
| + | |
− | • Conducting academic integrity workshops for faculty.
| + | |
− | • Observing faculty reactions to the operation of the Code and to the academic
| + | |
− | environment of Appalachian State University.
| + | |
− | 2. Student Committee
| + | |
− | The Student Committee is composed of the AIB’s six (6) student members and
| + | |
− | one (1) faculty member. The committee shall:
| + | |
− | • Promote academic integrity among their peers through a series of seminars,
| + | |
− | workshops, and classes.
| + | |
− | • Educate students about the seriousness of academic integrity.
| + | |
− | • Observe student reactions toward the operation of the Code and Appalachian
| + | |
− | State University’s academic environment.
| + | |
− | 49
| + | |
− | C. Academic Integrity Board Chairperson
| + | |
− | AIB members select a Chair and Vice Chair yearly in the Spring semester. The Chair
| + | |
− | may vote only in the case of a tie. A student Chair must be a junior or senior and have a
| + | |
− | minimum GPA of 2.5 at the time of election. The Chair’s duties include:
| + | |
− | • Presiding over all meetings and hearings of the full AIB.
| + | |
− | • Acting as spokesperson for the AIB.
| + | |
− | • Working closely with the Offi ce of Student Conduct throughout the Code’s
| + | |
− | operation.
| + | |
− | In the event of the Chair’s absence or inability to perform these duties, the Vice Chair
| + | |
− | assumes the above duties.
| + | |
− | VIII. Sanctions
| + | |
− | Under the Academic Integrity Code, there are three (3) times when sanctions may be imposed:
| + | |
− | (1) by consent of the student pursuant to Section VI.A.1.; (2) during the faculty/student
| + | |
− | resolution process; and (3) during an AIB hearing’s sanction phase.
| + | |
− | A. Faculty/Student Resolution Process Sanctions
| + | |
− | All offenses may be discussed between the faculty member and the accused student,
| + | |
− | unless the faculty member or student waives the right to the resolution process. Every
| + | |
− | violation presents faculty members the opportunity to educate students about academic
| + | |
− | integrity. The faculty member and the student may agree upon one (1) or more of the
| + | |
− | following sanctions:
| + | |
− | • A reduced grade on the assignment.
| + | |
− | • A reduced grade for the course.
| + | |
− | • A grade of F on the assignment.
| + | |
− | • A grade of F for the course.
| + | |
− | • Faculty members may require a student found in-violation of the Academic
| + | |
− | Integrity Code to attend a workshop on academic integrity.
| + | |
− | Members of the AIB conduct all workshops. The AIB reserves the right to impose another
| + | |
− | sanction on students who do not attend the mandatory workshop.
| + | |
− | B. Academic Integrity Board (AIB) Hearing Sanctions
| + | |
− | First time offenses are referred to the Offi ce of Student Conduct and all second offenses
| + | |
− | are subject to an AIB hearing. The AIB may recommend one (1) or more of the following
| + | |
− | sanctions when a student is found in-violation:
| + | |
− | • Referring the decision about sanction to the faculty member limited to the
| + | |
− | resolution process listed in VIII.A.
| + | |
− | • Probation.
| + | |
− | • Disciplinary suspension.
| + | |
− | • Expulsion.
| + | |
− | • Special programs.
| + | |
− | Students found in-violation of the Academic Integrity Code must attend a workshop on
| + | |
− | academic integrity (refer to VIII.A.).
| + | |
− | The AIB considers all relevant factors when recommending sanctions: e.g., seriousness,
| + | |
− | previous student record.
| + | |
− | 50
| + | |
− | IX. Appeals
| + | |
− | Students found in violation of the Academic Integrity Code may submit a written appeal to
| + | |
− | the Provost or his or her designee within fi ve (5) business days after notifi cation of their having
| + | |
− | been so found. Grounds for an appeal include signifi cant new evidence and procedural
| + | |
− | error. The Provost or his or her designee reserves the right to accept or reject any appeal.
| + | |
− | X. Amendments to Academic Integrity Code and Academic Integrity Board By-Laws
| + | |
− | Proposed amendments to the Academic Integrity Code and AIB By-Laws are recommendations
| + | |
− | to the Chancellor. The Academic Integrity Board may make recommendations for
| + | |
− | such changes to the Chancellor.
| + | |
− | Resolution forms can be downloaded from www.studentconduct.appstate.edu.
| + | |
| | | |
| == Additional References == | | == Additional References == |
| + | :[http://studentconduct.appstate.edu Code of Student Conduct] |
| | | |
| == Authority == | | == Authority == |
Line 295: |
Line 19: |
| | | |
| | | |
− | == Effective Date == | + | == Original Effective Date == |
| + | :Adopted May 21, 2001 |
| | | |
| == Revision Dates == | | == Revision Dates == |
| + | :For revision history, contact the Office of Student Conduct. |
| + | [[Category:Contents]] |
| + | [[Category:Academic Affairs]] |