|
|
| (50 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Policy ____ [''Number from Table of Contents''] | | Policy 205 |
| == Introduction == | | == Introduction == |
| You may copy this page's source to start a new policy page. Be sure to remove or overwrite the examples. Second level headings should NOT be altered.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Scope == | | == Scope == |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| == Definitions == | | == Definitions == |
|
| |
| === Definition phrase or word ===
| |
| : Definition summary
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| == Policy and Procedure Statements == | | == Policy and Procedure Statements == |
| | | === The Academic Integrity Code === |
| I. Introduction
| | :[https://academicintegrity.appstate.edu/ Academic Integrity] |
| II. The Academic Integrity Code
| |
| Students attending Appalachian State University agree to abide by the following Code:
| |
| • Students will not lie, cheat, or steal to gain academic advantage.
| |
| • Students will oppose every instance of academic dishonesty.
| |
| Students shall agree to abide by the Academic Integrity Code when submitting the admission
| |
| application.
| |
| III. The Honor Pledge
| |
| The Honor Pledge is a cornerstone of the Appalachian State University’s Academic Integrity
| |
| Code and serves as a reminder of the University’s commitment to academic integrity. No
| |
| Appalachian student shall unfairly further their own academic performance.
| |
| Students attending Appalachian State University pledge:
| |
| “I pledge on my honor that I have not violated the Appalachian State University Academic
| |
| Integrity Code.”
| |
| IV. Academic Integrity Code Violations
| |
| Violations of the Academic Integrity Code will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Faculty
| |
| should address incidents as possible Academic Integrity Code violations only when, in their
| |
| professional judgment, such violations were intentional on the part of the student. The following
| |
| is a list of violations of the Academic Integrity Code. This list is not exhaustive;
| |
| however, its terms are broad enough to encompass most potential Code violations.
| |
| • Lying. False academic information in any form, regardless of communication
| |
| method (e.g. including email or other electronic communication).
| |
| • Cheating. The use of fraud or deceit to gain an advantage in academic endeavors,
| |
| regardless of delivery methods (e.g. face-to-face, online, or via distance
| |
| education). Examples of cheating include but are not limited to fraud, deception,
| |
| impermissible communication of information, copying, falsifying data,
| |
| unauthorized use or possession of study aids, memoranda, books, data, or other
| |
| information, for the purpose of unfairly manipulating academic materials.
| |
| • Plagiarism. Presenting the words or ideas of another as one’s own work or ideas.
| |
| All directly quoted material must be properly cited. Plagiarism includes but is
| |
| not limited to borrowing, downloading, cutting and pasting, and paraphrasing
| |
| without acknowledgement, including from online sources, or allowing a person’s
| |
| academic work to be submitted as another’s work.
| |
| 45
| |
| • Unauthorized Assistance. Giving or receiving assistance not specifi cally permitted
| |
| by an instructor. (Examples: see under cheating)
| |
| • Stealing of Academic Materials. The act of taking academic materials, without
| |
| an instructor’s or student’s consent, for the purpose of gaining an advantage
| |
| over other students. This includes but is not limited to stealing or attempted
| |
| stealing of notes, papers, books, library materials, tests, answer keys, computer
| |
| programs, or any electronic devices.
| |
| • Multiple Submission without an Instructor’s Consent. Submitting the same
| |
| work more than once without permission from all faculty involved.
| |
| • Assisting Code Violations. Helping another student violate the Code. Examples
| |
| of assisting code violations include but are not limited to allowing another student
| |
| to copy work, provide answers to questions appearing on assignments, quizzes,
| |
| or exams, unauthorized collaboration, and taking an exam for another student.
| |
| V. Roles of the University Community
| |
| A. Faculty
| |
| Faculty members are responsible for educating students about academic integrity by
| |
| placing a statement about the Academic Integrity Code on class syllabi. Further, faculty
| |
| members are encouraged to limit opportunities for dishonest behavior. Several strategies
| |
| for reducing Academic Integrity Code violations are listed below. Faculty members may:
| |
| • Lead discussions about academic integrity during class.
| |
| • Create multiple versions of quizzes and exams.
| |
| • Proctor quizzes and exams.
| |
| • Provide a space for students to reaffi rm the Academic Integrity Honor Pledge
| |
| (abbreviation: HP) on assignments, quizzes, and exams.
| |
| • Contact the Offi ce of Student Conduct in all appropriate cases of academic
| |
| dishonesty.
| |
| • Include a statement about the Code of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity
| |
| Code (with Offi ce of Student Conduct website address) on syllabi.
| |
| • Use current events to illustrate and discuss integrity issues.
| |
| B. Students
| |
| Students are responsible for completing their own work on assignments, quizzes, and
| |
| tests and for discouraging their peers from violating the Academic Integrity Code. When
| |
| instructed to do so by a faculty member, students are required to include the Academic
| |
| Integrity Honor Pledge (or an abbreviated form of it) on assignments, quizzes, and exams.
| |
| Further, students may:
| |
| • Report all incidents of academic dishonesty to the Offi ce of Student Conduct.
| |
| • Inform the appropriate persons when witnessing academic dishonesty.
| |
| • Participate in discussions about academic integrity.
| |
| • Challenge their peers to uphold academic honesty.
| |
| C. Administration
| |
| Appalachian State University’s administration provides support for the Academic Integrity
| |
| Code through the activities described in Section VI.
| |
| 46
| |
| VI. Administration of the Code
| |
| A. Violations
| |
| Alleged Academic Integrity Code violations must be reported to the Offi ce of Student
| |
| Conduct if the faculty member proposes that a sanction, as defi ned in Section VIII, be
| |
| imposed on the student. The Director of Student Conduct or his or her designee will
| |
| explain all available options to the faculty member and student involved in the alleged
| |
| violation. Cases in which the faculty member proposes to take no action beyond requiring
| |
| the student to repeat the assignment may be resolved informally between the faculty
| |
| member and the student without being brought before the Offi ce of Student Conduct or
| |
| the Academic Integrity Board (AIB). In such cases, however, the faculty member must
| |
| utilize the form entitled “Proposed Requirement That You Repeat Assignment; Notifi cation
| |
| of Due Process Rights.” This requires the student to affi rm in writing that he/she is
| |
| aware of his/her option to refer the issue to Student Conduct but chooses the opportunity
| |
| to repeat the assignment instead. The faculty member should provide one copy of this
| |
| written statement to the student and retain the original in the faculty member’s fi les.
| |
| A student that has an alleged violation of the Academic Integrity Code is prohibited from
| |
| withdrawing from the course. Should a student withdraw from the class prior to the accusation
| |
| and/or resolution, the mark of "w" will be considered temporary pending the
| |
| fi nal resolution of the case. If a student is found responsible for an Academic Integrity
| |
| violation and receives a lower or failing grade in a course for violating the Academic
| |
| Integrity Code that course cannot be retroactively dropped.
| |
| 1. Resolution by Consent Without Resort to Academic Integrity Code Formal
| |
| Processes
| |
| Academic Integrity Code violations may be resolved by consent between
| |
| the student and the faculty member without resort to the formal processes
| |
| of the Academic Integrity Code, pursuant to this Section VI.A.1., or such
| |
| violations must be reported to the Offi ce of Student Conduct as provided
| |
| in Section VI.A.2, below. If the faculty member proposes to resolve the
| |
| violation by consent by imposing one of the sanctions specifi ed in Section
| |
| VIII.A., the faculty member must do so utilizing the form entitled
| |
| “Notifi cation of Proposed Imposition of Sanction for Academic Integrity
| |
| Violation; Notifi cation of Due Process Rights (Notifi cation).” A faculty
| |
| member may not impose sanctions to resolve a violation by consent pursuant
| |
| to this Section VI.A.1 without utilizing the Notifi cation form. If the
| |
| student decides to resolve the violation pursuant to this Section VI.A.1,
| |
| the student must sign the form, and the faculty member must make a
| |
| copy of the form for the student and retain the original for at least fi ve
| |
| years. A copy is also to be transmitted to the Offi ce of Student Conduct
| |
| and kept on fi le there for at least fi ve years.
| |
| 2. Reporting Violations
| |
| Academic Integrity Code violations not resolved by consent pursuant to
| |
| this Section VI.A.1., must be reported to the Offi ce of Student Conduct if
| |
| the faculty member proposes that one or more sanctions (as described in
| |
| Section VIII) be imposed. The Director of Student Conduct will explain
| |
| all available options to the faculty member and student involved in the
| |
| alleged violation.
| |
| 47
| |
| B. Review Offi cer
| |
| The Director of Student Conduct serves as the review offi cer or, as may be necessary,
| |
| appoints a member of the AIB to act in this capacity. An AIB member serving as a review
| |
| offi cer in a given case may not vote in a hearing on it. The responsibilities of the
| |
| review offi cer include:
| |
| • Investigating all reported incidents of academic dishonesty.
| |
| • Advising the parties involved in hearings.
| |
| • Handling all outside correspondence.
| |
| • Conducting and reporting on all faculty/student resolution processes.
| |
| • Preparing written statements for the hearing process.
| |
| • Forwarding all appeals to the Provost or his or her designee for a decision.
| |
| C. Faculty/Student Resolution Process
| |
| All fi rst time offenses may be handled in the faculty/student resolution process. Written
| |
| notice of the resolution process must be mailed to the faculty member and the student
| |
| involved at least seven (7) business days in advance of a resolution process meeting.
| |
| The review offi cer facilitates and records the meeting’s outcome. The faculty member
| |
| and the accused student must agree upon one of the sanctions to decide the case in this
| |
| phase or determine that there was not an intentional violation of the Academic Integrity
| |
| Code. If agreement is reached, the faculty member, student, and hearing offi cer sign a
| |
| standard form stating the terms of the resolution. A copy of the resolution form is retained
| |
| in the Offi ce of Student Conduct until the student leaves the University. If the faculty
| |
| member and student do not agree upon a resolution, the case is referred to the AIB for a
| |
| hearing. All decisions agreed to in the resolution phase are fi nal and cannot be appealed.
| |
| Either the faculty member or student may waive their right to the resolution process. If a
| |
| faculty member or student does not wish to participate in the resolution process, the case
| |
| is referred to the AIB for a hearing. Faculty members may re-enter the process during
| |
| the hearing as a complainant or witness.
| |
| D. Hearings
| |
| Proceedings under the Academic Integrity Code shall be consistent with the provisions
| |
| of the AIB by-laws. First offenses may be resolved between the student and the faculty
| |
| member; a record is then maintained in the Offi ce of Student Conduct. All second offenses
| |
| are decided through an AIB hearing. The Chairperson of the AIB presides over
| |
| the hearing. Seven AIB members constitute a quorum. The AIB’s fi nal decision is made
| |
| by a majority vote. The rules governing AIB hearings include:
| |
| • Notifi cation of the hearing date and the specifi c charges of academic dishonesty,
| |
| including an outline of the information to be introduced, are mailed to the accused
| |
| student at least fi ve (5) academic days, including fi nal examination days,
| |
| in advance.
| |
| • The burden of proof is on the faculty member and/or student bringing forth
| |
| the charges. The Offi ce of Student Conduct provides administrative support
| |
| for faculty and students bringing forth charges of academic dishonesty. The
| |
| Offi ce of Student Conduct also provides information about the process for the
| |
| accused student.
| |
| • Formal rules of evidence are not applicable. The AIB Chairperson must give
| |
| attention to the rules of confi dentiality and privilege.
| |
| • Students and faculty are allowed one (1) advisor. Advisors may speak to the
| |
| student or faculty member, but may not speak for the student or faculty member.
| |
| 48
| |
| • The accused student and the Academic Integrity Board are permitted to question
| |
| the complainant and all witnesses.
| |
| • AIB hearings and deliberations are closed to the public.
| |
| • All hearings are recorded and may be transcribed when necessary. Recordings
| |
| of hearings remain the exclusive property of the University. Students must
| |
| review recordings in the presence of Student Conduct personnel.
| |
| • Witnesses are excluded from the hearing during the testimony of other witnesses.
| |
| All witnesses are excluded from AIB deliberations.
| |
| • The AIB fi nds in-violation or not in-violation of the Academic Integrity Code
| |
| on the basis of the preponderance of evidence.
| |
| • If the AIB fi nds the student in-violation, the Offi ce of Student Conduct retains
| |
| a record of the fi nding and sanction for a minimum of fi ve (5) years.
| |
| VII. Academic Integrity Board (AIB)
| |
| A. Composition
| |
| Appalachian State University’s Academic Integrity Board consists of twelve (12) members.
| |
| Six (6) faculty members and six (6) students are appointed to the Board. Faculty AIB
| |
| members are nominated by the Committee on Committees of the Faculty Senate from a
| |
| list of volunteers willing to serve, and approved by a vote of the Faculty Senate. Faculty
| |
| members serve three-year staggered terms and may be nominated for consecutive terms.
| |
| Student AIB members are selected by the Conduct Personnel Committee (see Section 3.06
| |
| of the Code of Student Conduct). Student AIB members serve two-year staggered terms.
| |
| B. Committees
| |
| The AIB contains two (2) standing committees: (1) the faculty committee and (2) the
| |
| student committee.
| |
| 1. Faculty Committee
| |
| The Faculty Committee is composed of the AIB’s six (6) faculty members and
| |
| one (1) student member. This committee is charged with:
| |
| • Providing their peers with guidelines for promoting and enforcing academic
| |
| integrity.
| |
| • Educating faculty about academic integrity issues.
| |
| • Conducting academic integrity workshops for faculty.
| |
| • Observing faculty reactions to the operation of the Code and to the academic
| |
| environment of Appalachian State University.
| |
| 2. Student Committee
| |
| The Student Committee is composed of the AIB’s six (6) student members and
| |
| one (1) faculty member. The committee shall:
| |
| • Promote academic integrity among their peers through a series of seminars,
| |
| workshops, and classes.
| |
| • Educate students about the seriousness of academic integrity.
| |
| • Observe student reactions toward the operation of the Code and Appalachian
| |
| State University’s academic environment.
| |
| 49
| |
| C. Academic Integrity Board Chairperson
| |
| AIB members select a Chair and Vice Chair yearly in the Spring semester. The Chair
| |
| may vote only in the case of a tie. A student Chair must be a junior or senior and have a
| |
| minimum GPA of 2.5 at the time of election. The Chair’s duties include:
| |
| • Presiding over all meetings and hearings of the full AIB.
| |
| • Acting as spokesperson for the AIB.
| |
| • Working closely with the Offi ce of Student Conduct throughout the Code’s
| |
| operation.
| |
| In the event of the Chair’s absence or inability to perform these duties, the Vice Chair
| |
| assumes the above duties.
| |
| VIII. Sanctions
| |
| Under the Academic Integrity Code, there are three (3) times when sanctions may be imposed:
| |
| (1) by consent of the student pursuant to Section VI.A.1.; (2) during the faculty/student
| |
| resolution process; and (3) during an AIB hearing’s sanction phase.
| |
| A. Faculty/Student Resolution Process Sanctions
| |
| All offenses may be discussed between the faculty member and the accused student,
| |
| unless the faculty member or student waives the right to the resolution process. Every
| |
| violation presents faculty members the opportunity to educate students about academic
| |
| integrity. The faculty member and the student may agree upon one (1) or more of the
| |
| following sanctions:
| |
| • A reduced grade on the assignment.
| |
| • A reduced grade for the course.
| |
| • A grade of F on the assignment.
| |
| • A grade of F for the course.
| |
| • Faculty members may require a student found in-violation of the Academic
| |
| Integrity Code to attend a workshop on academic integrity.
| |
| Members of the AIB conduct all workshops. The AIB reserves the right to impose another
| |
| sanction on students who do not attend the mandatory workshop.
| |
| B. Academic Integrity Board (AIB) Hearing Sanctions
| |
| First time offenses are referred to the Offi ce of Student Conduct and all second offenses
| |
| are subject to an AIB hearing. The AIB may recommend one (1) or more of the following
| |
| sanctions when a student is found in-violation:
| |
| • Referring the decision about sanction to the faculty member limited to the
| |
| resolution process listed in VIII.A.
| |
| • Probation.
| |
| • Disciplinary suspension.
| |
| • Expulsion.
| |
| • Special programs.
| |
| Students found in-violation of the Academic Integrity Code must attend a workshop on
| |
| academic integrity (refer to VIII.A.).
| |
| The AIB considers all relevant factors when recommending sanctions: e.g., seriousness,
| |
| previous student record.
| |
| 50
| |
| IX. Appeals
| |
| Students found in violation of the Academic Integrity Code may submit a written appeal to
| |
| the Provost or his or her designee within fi ve (5) business days after notifi cation of their having
| |
| been so found. Grounds for an appeal include signifi cant new evidence and procedural
| |
| error. The Provost or his or her designee reserves the right to accept or reject any appeal.
| |
| X. Amendments to Academic Integrity Code and Academic Integrity Board By-Laws
| |
| Proposed amendments to the Academic Integrity Code and AIB By-Laws are recommendations
| |
| to the Chancellor. The Academic Integrity Board may make recommendations for
| |
| such changes to the Chancellor.
| |
| Resolution forms can be downloaded from www.studentconduct.appstate.edu.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Additional References == | | == Additional References == |
| | :[http://studentconduct.appstate.edu Code of Student Conduct] |
|
| |
|
| == Authority == | | == Authority == |
| Line 290: |
Line 19: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| == Effective Date == | | == Original Effective Date == |
| | :Adopted May 21, 2001 |
|
| |
|
| == Revision Dates == | | == Revision Dates == |
| | :For revision history, contact the Office of Student Conduct. |
| | [[Category:Contents]] |
| | [[Category:Academic Affairs]] |
